• 글쓰기
• 목록

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was running clean on an analogous stack with only a few servers (when you think about the traffic).Should you ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who're realistically the one ones needing it, however they saw an opportunity to scoop up market share in dev so that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The one thing bleeding is my eyes once i see one thing that may very well be wiped up in an ordinary PHP/Python/Ruby stack but instead is made with so many dependencies and 3rd celebration library that you just wonder if the dude who wrote it actually knows programming or if he just glued cool techs collectively because Techcrunch and HackerNews say they're cool.But sure, the smaller players are often using outdated stuff, then again 99% of the web is. Hence why Wordpress remains to be a thing.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can assure you that tech peeps undoubtedly are conscious of the bleeding edge of tech, just that almost all tend to not purchase the hype.

Inventions that have been forward of their time may help us to grasp whether we are actually able to live on this planet we are making. Speculative fiction fans know that you may create an entire world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a complete alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her each element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that represent a coherent actuality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the actual world is nearly exactly the same; that’s why invention is a danger. After we create one thing new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of help it can have in the world in which it emerges and the facility it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that usually signifies that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It could possibly be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet pc, even though his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: xhamster twenty years of technological growth provided higher hardware, screens, batteries, software program, and connectivity. And even though anyone eager about a pill had in all probability been prepared for one since even earlier than the MessagePad thanks to the Star Trek universe being filled with PADDs, the one factor that actually prepared the world for the pill computer was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world wherein over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to mobile computing is one prepared for a bridge gadget between a small mobile display screen and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences that are commonplace right now made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t really succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, however as a result of the world wasn’t quite prepared and so they weren’t powerful sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years earlier than Minority Report informed us all to anticipate them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 player, after all; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It also wasn’t the primary actually good or actually profitable one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit for that. But, it did risk its id on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to just weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but fast demise after a well known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But almost a decade later, every major tech company is both making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which over and over. There are, of course, many older examples. Much older ones, in actual fact, like the precise first car - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the first gasoline powered car car launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, but it surely wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it seems that the basics of batteries have been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental concept of transmitting image and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (long before any of us have been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would drive us into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many decades). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the first public video name from Washington, D.C.